Blog

Australian IT JOBS : Sydney IT jobs, UNIX jobs, Linux jobs, Java jobs, ASP jobs Linux.conf.au Linux.conf.au
Technology news and Jobs arrow Our Blogs arrow Open Sauce - A GNU perspective arrow GPL-BSD stoush: de Raadt hints at legal action
GPL-BSD stoush: de Raadt hints at legal action PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sam Varghese   
Friday, 14 September 2007

De Raadt also contends that the work done by Kossifidis is not sufficient for him to claim copyright.

"Behind the scenes, we have also looked very closely at the work by Nick and Jiri using their repositories, and have found that most positively Jiri did not write any changes that are valid for copyright...

"Nick's changes are minorly more functional in nature, but once again almost clearly not valid for placing a copyright on a work done primarily by another author - that being Reyk.  Reyk's work was
already a fully functional driver implimentation (sic), and Nick's work are (sic) an adaptation.  This does not give him the right to assert Copyright."

And earlier on in his comments, he asserted: "People in the Linux community are being told they can slap a copyright onto files; they cannot without doing sufficient original work.

"If Reyk sues in Germany, the court's decision applies in the entire world. Especially since the two infringing authors live in Greece and the Czech Republic. (Since they are in the European Union, it is
definately criminal law with penalties).

"US law is very different, but it does not matter at all. The SFLC has made a serious mistake advising foreigners about the law. In fact, there is someone looking into the question of whether Eben has
violated his Bar association agreements by doing so."

De Raadt said that in this case "functional and original source code under one person's copyright was editorially marked up to make it run on another operating system (basically no functional changes; only a few small bugs fixed on the way). And then another licence was wrapped around the whole file. That's not legal.

"That would be a derivatative (sic) work *ONLY* if it has original work, and adaptation is legally not original work. They are on very shaky ground indeed."


Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
When you subscribe get a 12 months license for LiveProject
Valued at $99 USD


LiveWire - Desktop alerts Download the FREE iTWire desktop alert widget LiveWire - Desktop alerts


Del.icio.us!


 
< Prev   Next >
Open Sauce - A GNU perspective Subscribe to the RSS
Open Sauce focuses on the wonderful, wacky world of free and open source software where people write great applications and actually allow others to use them without payment.

Open Sauce posts

Contact , Register , Advertise with iTWire , Links , Register , About iTWire , Feedback , Post your jobs , Events , iTWire site map , Start Blogging
Industry Releases , Submit your release now , Start submitting to iTWire , How to post video