The Linux distillery
Bringing the world of Linux to you, this blog will cut through the tech and show you how it works and how to use it, in terms that apply to any distro. RSS
Australian IT JOBS : Sydney IT jobs, UNIX jobs, Linux jobs, Java jobs, ASP jobs Linux.conf.au Linux.conf.au
Technology news and Jobs arrow The Linux distillery arrow Real answers to the question “Can you run your business on Linux and open source?”
Real answers to the question “Can you run your business on Linux and open source?” PDF Print E-mail
Written by David M Williams   
Monday, 26 November 2007
My first respondent raised an excellent point, telling me “the biggest reason of moving is that you can move away from the high price [of] licenses that are required with Windows.”

Ordinarily, when people compare operating systems they tend to think of the price tag of the OS alone. Windows Server 2003 obviously costs some money but on the whole, it may not seem so hefty. But yet, what is generally forgotten are the ancillary costs – I know a recent Microsoft Exchange 2007 implementation which cost $16,000 alone for the retail box set of Microsoft Exchange 2007 with 25 client access licenses. Another company were looking to buy 64-bit SQL Server 2005 and agonised over whether to buy individual client licenses or pay the $8,000 required per processor for a server-based license. This pricetag meant they had to scale back their hardware intentions from dual-processor to single processor just because of the licensing costs.

Still on the financials, my correspondent added “there are also the lower admin overheads and higher availability” implicitly referring to the way Linux systems can be set running with minimal maintenance required, whereas Windows administrators still like to perform a routine periodic reboot just for safety.

On the subject of lost services he told me the only thing they noticed out of the box was out-of-office notifications. “These are still there and could be done with straight distro installs, but the administrator would have to apply them to the MTA config (unless you use openXchange or zimbra)” he said.

No other problems where noticed. He reported they had solved authentication issues using LDAP with replication to all servers and using Samba 3.0.24. This, he said, had slick integration with XP clients and Windows 2003 servers in both directions. Additionally, his company enhanced their mail platform by using “Postfix for the MTA with amavis and spamassassin.” This, he advised, took a little tuning to stop spamassassin giving false positives but was do-able.

This wasn’t the death knell for Windows, however. The company still had to retain some Windows servers due to specific accounting and CRM applications with no suitable Linux equivalent – but apart from these niche line-of-business apps, all core server functions were fully replaced with Linux equivalents.

“All in all,” he finished, “I would suggest that Linux be used where ever it’s possible to do so, but Windows (in the short term) will still play a small part in the server network.”

This was a very heartening response and should give confidence to doubters. Yet, I noticed that this organisation opted to leave desktop computers alone. As I talked with other people I pushed harder, asking if they’d genuinely consider going a total open source route, running their enterprise solely on Linux and applications like Open Office.



 
< Prev   Next >
Contact , Register , Advertise with iTWire , Links , Register , About iTWire , Feedback , Post your jobs , Events , iTWire site map , Start Blogging
Industry Releases , Submit your release now , Start submitting to iTWire , How to post video