Blog

Australian IT JOBS : Sydney IT jobs, UNIX jobs, Linux jobs, Java jobs, ASP jobs Linux.conf.au Linux.conf.au
Technology news and Jobs arrow Our Blogs arrow Open Sauce - A GNU perspective arrow OOXML: move the goalposts, avoid facing the obvious
OOXML: move the goalposts, avoid facing the obvious PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sam Varghese   
Friday, 21 December 2007
Last week, following a radio discussion, linux.com writer Bruce Byfield characterised two opposing FOSS camps in the OOXML debate who participated in that discussion as being "closer than they have appeared in the past."

The two camps were represented by Roy Schestowitz, the co-founder of the BoycottNovell website, and Jeff Waugh, the media spokesman of the GNOME Foundation. There were a few others who piled on to make it an unequal debate for Schestowitz.

I called this claim insane.

Now Byfield, who's beginning to rapidly show his colours as an apologist for the GNOME faction of this debate, says my claim was made about his "suggestion that both sides believed that they were acting for the good of the community." He seems to have forgotten what he wrote a week ago. Conveniently so.

The goalposts have moved. That's the best way to avoid having to face a problem.

Spinmeisters are excellent at this. Let's say the rate of unemployment is high. What do we do? Redefine the word "employed" so that the numbers drop. The man who does an hour of community work a week is now defined as an employed person. Hey presto, the problem solves itself. Nothing material has changed but who gives a stuff?

Another person in the same camp is Linux Journal contributor Glyn Moody. The picture this good soul paints is: this schism is harming FOSS. We need to heal it. (he doesn't have any ideas on how it should be healed, though).

And the best way to push this position is by terming it the "sane" option. Byfield doesn't want to be on one side or the other. He wants a "saner" position. Reminds me of the position taken by the bat when the birds and the beasts were at war with each other.

Some hard and logical questions need to be asked.

First, OOXML as defined by the specs provided by Microsoft to the standards body ECMA, and OOXML, the binary output from Microsoft Office 2007, are two different things. They meet different specs. Nobody knows the specs for the OOXML that Office 2007 outputs. Why are FOSS people getting involved in this at all?


 
< Prev   Next >

Latest jobs

Open Sauce - A GNU perspective Subscribe to the RSS
Open Sauce focuses on the wonderful, wacky world of free and open source software where people write great applications and actually allow others to use them without payment.

Open Sauce posts

Contact , Register , Advertise with iTWire , Links , Register , About iTWire , Feedback , Post your jobs , Events , iTWire site map , Start Blogging
Industry Releases , Submit your release now , Start submitting to iTWire , How to post video